Fast, Flexible Mobile Space for Fun (aka Dr. Fab's Instant Dance Party) on Tudou
Cool Tips on Tudou
(more coming soon...)
High Lane Concept on Tudou
Fast, Flexible Mobile Space for Fun (aka Dr. Fab's Instant Dance Party) on Tudou Cool Tips on Tudou (more coming soon...)
0 Comments
Susan presenting. A crowd of experts. Three presentations Prototypes. Feedback session with experts. Preparing to prototype the experience. Acting is hard. Being fabulous is harder. Good work, good times. Healthy Homes Shanghai Workshop at the Eco Design Fair.
Adventures in Design Research (flickr set)
Friday's work was impressive, well done, it was evident that a lot of thinking, team work and discussion had taken place - keep it up, here's the follow up and requirements for this week - have fun, enjoy and go find out...
Thanks for the great session last week.
This is our Flickr group, it will help us collect all the documentation of the work. Please share your photos :) http://www.flickr.com/groups/healthyhomesshanghai/ As we are conducting stakeholder analysis at the moment, I got to thinking about the differences between home owners and renters. As the title says, food for thought. Are home owners better stewards of the environment than renters and investors? If so, why? And how can that help us? Let's start with the example of renting a car versus owning a car. Your car is a cherished object, something that reflects you. A significant investment. The rental is not yours (and you've got insurance against damages, so do your worst) which makes it a resource and one that you want to squeeze the most value out of - rather than put value into. It's a license for abuse. So it would seem that ownership or more importantly the sense of care and emotional attachment ownership evokes can be a powerful tool. My assumption would be that home owners, in general, make for more considerate and thoughtful inhabitants because they have a bigger stake in the long term health and quality of the environment. They are more mindful of their actions. Mindfulness seems like a great quality to reinforce because it supports better decision making - what is the easy thing to do can be trumped by what is the better thing to do - that's quite a good trick to have up your sleeve if you are trying to get people to make difficult changes. Can we transfer that sense of care and mindfulness to things which are not owned? Can you become attached to a service? Can a renter cherish their home and thereby be better stewards of their environment? Maybe if we gave them a way and a reason to do it. How might we transfuse some of the desired qualities (i.e. a cherished investment) of homeownership to renters? (ex: Collective ownership? Temporary upgrades?) Or, perhaps even better, how might we provide renters with alternate paths to home ownership? (ex: Contests, ponzi schemes and lotteries) from Susan:
Welcome back after the holidays and welcome to the sustainable design challenge and workshop...we are a little slow off the start as we have been trying to co-ordinate various groups of students. Following a meeting today, with Lou Yongqi we are now all connected, we have everyone on board and the next meeting has been confirmed and is set for friday 15th October 13.30 at Aalto Factory Studio 4th floor. You will find the Brief page updated with the course framework. Please note there is some work required by the 15th of October. An excellent start to the research. On the research blog we have two posts from Jonathan and Luigi that I found to be very insightful and thought provoking. Jonathan highlights the lack of boundaries between private and public life found in many Chinese living situations and the potential in designing for a more communal living environment. "How relevant is the social aspect in healthy home solutions?Then, if sociality is really that important, wouldn't be more effective to improve communal healthy living solutions rather than focusing on private ones, considering both the physical space limitation and the Chinese socio-political and cultural heritage, traditionally oriented towards shared solutions?" Luigi's post continues this thread of public vs private and how expectations of the new generation of white collar workers are finding it difficult to attain the dream of owning their own private home.
How important is the need to own a private house in today's chinese society? Which are the values that chinese people give home and how do they live it? How could these elements be analyzed to create better living conditions? I highly recommend reading the article on Foriegn Policy that Luigi links to: Bubble Bubble, China's in Trouble: The Mad Scramble for Chinese real estate, which talks not only about the frustrations of young workers "born too late", but also the lack of options that China's wealthy have for investing their money which is creating all sorts of complex, interesting problems like a glut of empty apartments and a push to developers to continue to build homes not many people can afford. Zombie buildings, perhaps entire zombie cities, and plenty of people who want homes but can't afford them. |
POLITECNICO DI MILANO + TONGJI UNIVERSITYFacilitators |